In computer science we often have to take a real life scenario and translate it into cold machine logic. For the diciest situations, we invented things like fuzzy logic, and so-called Artificial Intelligence algorithms. These terms obscure how little progress has been made in this field. The ability to mimic or reproduce the human brain, something we all have (ok, most of us) still eludes science.
![]() |
![]() |
In 1996, a computer called (Deep Blue) designed by IBM became the first machine to defeat a reigning world chess champion - Gary Kasparov. Kasparov went on to win some of his subsequent matches with Deep Blue. After one defeat, he explained “I only made one mistake but unfortunately that one mistake lost the game“. We can’t consistently compete with computers when it comes to computations per second, or predicting specific outcomes in a controlled environment based on probability. Lacking our creativity and imagination, machines are on the other hand completely helpless when it comes to dealing with the unexpected.
One simple example is the array of mediocre text to speech and voice recognition technologies available. I setup one such software for my dad to assist in reading lengthy articles. You simply highlight text, and a “virtual assistant” named Hilda appears to read it out loud. On the one hand, it is understandable, and if you increase the reading speed, you will actually finish the article faster than reading it since we comprehend speech much faster than we can read. Still, while Hilda means well; she only speaks English, and even a 5 year old has better pronunciation. Is this a failure on the software’s part, or an indication of how complex something so basic as learning a language can be.
For a child, communication is the first step towards adulthood, and loss of innocence. One day soon, machines will be powerful enough to learn, understand and speak our language. I wonder if the next challenge will be to devise new algorithms to teach machines our insincerity and hypocrisy. The ability to hide what we really think, and say only what benefits us. Will the next Deep Blue be able to compete with a used car salesman ? Since the 70s, the first code programmers are traditionally taught is to simply display the phrase (Hello World!) on the screen. The idea is that it is so simple, anyone can do it, but is it?
Warning: If you’re still reading this; I’m getting sleepy, and hence less serious.
Hi, Hello, Hey ! Why do we greet people with meaningless words ? Does it mean: I’m here, look at me, talk to me, I want attention ! Compliment my hair! Nooooo don’t look at my nose!
Why do we say “how are you?” after the initial hello, when we often couldn’t care less about the answer? In its rudest form, people will say Hi and How are you in full motion without stopping for an answer. It’s most awkward when you ask someone how they’re doing and they actually give you a short essay; consider it payback for asking insincerely.
Another prickly situation is when you greet someone and they don’t answer. Did they
A. Not hear you?
B. Simply not want to answer ?
It’s important to know because if it’s A, they can potentially get upset because you didn’t say hello, so you may have to consider a repeat hello (re-hello). If it’s B then saying Hello again will be desperate. Years ago I lived in an apartment abroad with my brother, and one day, I got home, said hello, and walked to my room. My brother followed and asked why I didn’t say hello to him. I suggested he simply did not hear me. Later he would call my parents and complain that I’m not saying hello to him! At that point, in the interests of peace, I explained that if this is going to upset him, we should formally cease all greeting protocols until further notice, and simply proceed directly to standard conversational activities. Ok, so it wasn’t one of my most brilliant ideas. You can’t get rid of years of tradition on a whim.
Then there is the local kissing greeting. I’m confused do you kiss 2 times, 3 times, 5 times, until further notice ? Do you kiss the left cheek and then the right cheek, or vica versa ? If both people wear glasses, do they get an automatic kissing exemption ? I don’t wear glasses anymore, luckily I learned a neat trick a few years ago from watching how the King greets several dignitaries at one time. When he doesn’t want to kiss someone on the cheek, he would lean slightly back, and use both hands in the handshake. I also found it helps if you look the person directly in the eye and silently meditate on the words “No, I don’t want to kiss you“!
In any case I’ve always been more of a hugger than a kisser. A fellow blogger explained that women have the option of leaning forward in a hug to minimise breast contact. Somehow, I never lost this mental image.
On driving out of Queen Alia, you are greeted with a large sign that says (A big Jordanian Welcome). I think the traditional Jordanian greeting is (حياك الله) (Hayak Allah) which seems to literally translate to (God said hello to you). The short form is just (Hayak). A friend I asked about this explained it is actually a different form of (الله يحييك) (Allah Yihayeek) which translates to (May God say Hello to you). Somehow this didn’t make it better. Presumably one will meet (and greet) their maker when they die, so are you wishing someone dead when you say (Hayak Allah), or have I been led astray by my poor mastery of the Arabic language?
I always found the customary muslim greeting (السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته) (Al-Salam Alaikum Wa Rahmatu Allah Wa Barakatuh) too long and formal. I tried to shorten it to just (Salam), but it didn’t meet with public approval, and it sounds too much like the Hebrew Shalom. So I only use the intermediate form (Salam Alaikum) when greeting multiple people as it seems simpler and more elegant than greeting every single person in the room. Yet I am reluctant to use it so as not to misrepresent my religiosity.
I’m going to leave you with one of my favorite songs. An oldie, but if you like mushy music it’s a goodie.
|
|
| Hello again, hello Just called to say hello I couldn’t sleep at all tonight And I know it’s late But I couldn’t waitHello, my friend, hello Just called to let you know I think about you ev’ry night When I’m here alone And you’re there at home, hello Maybe it’s been crazy Hello, my friend, hello Hello, my friend, hello |






12 Users Commented In This Post
Posted from
1-14-2008 at 08:42:47
Hmmmm!
Alright, there’s so much in this article to cover a whole month of posts. It’s really hard to decide where to start…
But let me give you an example of how complex human emotions are. Consider Data, star trek TNG’s character. He’s continuously searching for the ability to have emotions, while discovering how dangerous that could be. He could do wonders in computations, but not understand a single joke. I know, I know, it’s fiction and in reality it might be way different. But give it a little thought and you will find that these existentialist questions are warranted. These are very difficult things to comprehend. Even for chess-grandmaster-beating-computer-program-managed-by-100-people like deepblue
Posted from
1-14-2008 at 19:31:57
We’re on the same wavelength Qwaider, I was thinking of Data as I wrote this post. Also in one TNG episode they had some sort of lifeforms that speak binary (nothing but 1s and 0s) repairing the enterprise. I was thinking that machines should have as much trouble understanding our language patterns than we would in understanding binary speech. The beautiful thing about Data’s character was that he would question things we would take for granted. Yet we can identify with him more than with Spock’s character in the original series.
I didn’t know it took 100 people to manage Deep Blue, I guess Kasparov deserved more credit than I gave him.
Posted from
1-15-2008 at 08:20:32
When it comes to AI it depends on whether or not you believe in the soul (no, not God… this is a separate issue).
Speaking from a strictly scientific perspective, emotions are electric impulses and chemical influxes in the body. How these come along is disputed (most probably as an instinctive/genetic stimulus response). In order for machines to have emotions you need to replicate those electric impulses.
Now, this isn’t exactly enough. You need prior experience to be able to handle such stimulus (which can be possibly generated through neural networks if a supercomputer is available to process such complex input). The AI also needs to take into account other present stimuli to integrate with previous knowledge to come up with a context-sensitive response to the emotion in question.
I don’t see this being possible at the moment - throw in a soul and you’re just running around in circles. The human brain is certainly a marvelous thing - with or without a soul. Its ability to just process all this in fractions of seconds plus communicate with different regions of the brain to facilitate a response is just - if you’d allow me to say it - Godly.
Now regarding the greetings, I always go for a hug. I kissed way too many men by now it isn’t funny!
Posted from
1-15-2008 at 18:42:25
why do i have the feeling that my reply got deleted!
Posted from
1-16-2008 at 21:01:07
I loved Data. You sci-fi nerds rock. I should say “WE”… Anyway… If you want to do away with the hypocrisy, tell everyone you’re autistic. I have never seen such healthy honesty of work and deed as that of an autistic person. You can ask “how are you?” and really wait for and listen to the answer. If it bores you, you can say so and walk away. I feel sorry for autistic people who can’t understand why we play the games we do when we don’t always know why we play along with them either…
Posted from
1-22-2008 at 12:09:00
TeacherLady. I was surprised to learn the actor who plays Data (Brent Spiner) is from Texas!
I have never met an autistic before, but I will remember that when I do.
I can honestly say, I’ve only ever met 1 honest person ever! Maybe that means there aren’t a lot of them around, or just that I’m too much of an introvert!
Posted from
1-23-2008 at 00:40:35
I do not know if you know but I am a very big Neil Diamond fan.. I saw him in concert two times. Well this is one of my favorite songs and guess what? I thought of you. So when you are feeling lonely and need some Frannie time just play this and I am not far away. xx
Posted from
1-23-2008 at 13:33:39
Hello Fran, no I didn’t know you were a fan. This song does hit you straight in the heart.
Cheers!
Posted from
1-25-2008 at 12:52:21
I’ve never really understood why men in the Arab world kiss when they greet each other. It contradicts that staunch masculine Arab image most men tend to lean towards doesn’t it?
It’s interesting to think of all the different expressions that people use to greet each other in Arabic. I prefer expressions like Sabah El Kheir/Masa’ El Kheir and I love hearing the variations that people in Egypt come up with in Egypt. They’re always pretty creative =)
Posted from
1-25-2008 at 13:06:51
I’m not sure about the masculine image, I just don’t like to feel another man’s beard on my face, so a hnadshake will do :)
yes, Egyptians are creative, but the quality I admire is their sense of humor. A cheerful smile when greeting someone is far more powerful to me than serial kissing!
Posted from
1-27-2008 at 22:05:06
KJ, I just went through my Akismet spam plugin, it caught 500 spam messages, and I managed to find yours among them 10 days later. Sorry, it’s the first time it does this. I can’t imaging which word in your post triggered it. Probably stimulus as it is often used in ads :)
About machines having emotions. Do you really have to replicate the impulses, or just simulate the result. If we can’t tell the difference between the simulation and the real-thing, then have we succeeded in creating emotions? Aren’t we ourselves machines with biological components?
Anyhow, I don’t think anyone is aiming to create human machines. Those who try (some Japanese companies) are only creating a few as a novelty, and for publicity. I guess the way we say hello or say anything else for that matter wouldn’t make sense in machine logic. I was just wondering what would be worse, cold machine logic, or human emotions at their worst (war atrocities, serial killers, abuse, murder, rape etc…). Would you characterise those as Godly as well ?
Posted from
1-28-2008 at 09:02:33
hehehe
You attempt to trap me with your cunning words ;)
I am not saying the acts are Godly, I am saying “how it works” is. Yes, of course all of these are Godly as well. Humans (cough cough Imams cough) always say that whatever good attributes should be attributed to God and whatever bad attributes are ungodly.
I believe all attributes are human but the mechanism to which they are brought about is Godly - and I am not saying Godly as in God-made (but I believe it is) I was just using it as a metaphor.
Sharing Is Caring.....